33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives on the police is usually to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and over all, be certain legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair towards the offender plus the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court along with from other Courts, Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
How much sway case law holds may perhaps fluctuate by jurisdiction, and by the exact circumstances of the current case. To take a look at this concept, take into account the following case legislation definition.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is often a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents of the boy or Woman will not approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they can do if they might Reduce off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy who is a major, the pair is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who provides this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against these kinds of persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by legislation.
This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners failed a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances on the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 with the Constitution. Read more
184 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as established forth would not apply, as the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, relatively he has become acquitted with the criminal charges based on evidence and it can be nicely-settled legislation that once the civil servant is acquitted while in the criminal case, then on this quite charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment because of the department and held him disqualified with the post because acquittal for all long run purposes. The aforesaid proposition has actually been established at naught with the Supreme Court of Pakistan while in the case on the District Police Officer Mainwali and a pair of others v.
Generally speaking, higher courts never have direct oversight over the decreased courts of record, in that they cannot reach out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments in the decreased courts.
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice with the Peace u/s 22-A isn't obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing to the accused party; nor obliged to essentially or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to consider all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a number of the relevant factors. Read more
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. twelve. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons owning their character previously mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to your Government service could be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to try and do away with the candidature of the petitioner. Read more
Case legislation, also used interchangeably with common legislation, is usually a regulation that is based on precedents, that is the judicial decisions from previous cases, fairly than legislation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case legislation uses the detailed facts of a legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
Are you looking for Court Information? You need to use our site to search for just a case or search for any person. Information over the site is updated every 24 hours at 3:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found about the search site is provided for use as reference material and isn't the official court record.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi check here It's effectively-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 times. If your appeal is not really decided within that timeframe, he/she will be able to then approach the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the 90 days to the department to act has already expired. About the aforesaid proposition, we're guided through the decision in the Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.
Problems or Errors When you encounter any technical problems with this website (for instance a bad link or possibly a portion of the opinion lacking), please notify the eService Center.
As being the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is achieved, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Criminal cases From the common regulation tradition, courts decide the law applicable to your case by interpreting statutes and implementing precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. As opposed to most civil legislation systems, common regulation systems follow the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their possess previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lower courts should make decisions constant with the previous decisions of higher courts.